Write a conclusion for this essay:

In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.

What is your opinion about this?

There is a high demand for new homes in many areas, but the only viable location for their construction is in the countryside. However, some individuals say that protecting the countryside takes precedence over building new dwellings in theses areas. While the need for more housing is apparent, the impact on the countryside must also be recognized, so a balanced approach should be favored, in my opinion. This essay will elaborate on my point of view.

On the one hand, I agree that building new homes in the countryside removes pressure on authorities to meet the expanding population’s housing needs. To be more specific, as cities continue to grow, so does the demand for housing, resulting in higher housing costs and homelessness. As a result, building new homes in the countryside may alleviate some of these housing demands. Cities such as London and Tokyo, for example, are struggling to offer cheap housing for its citizens, which may be eased in part by developing housing choices in rural areas.

On the other hand, preserving the natural environment in the countryside is equally important because it is necessary for human well-being and ecological equilibrium. Indeed, rural settings provide a respite from the fast-paced metropolitan lifestyle, with chances for recreation and relaxation. As a result, transforming natural places into urban areas may have a negative impact on the ecology and disrupt the equilibrium of local wildlife. For example, the Cotswolds in the United Kingdom, renowned for its gorgeous vistas, sustains not only tourism but also a variety of flora and fauna. The construction of additional residences in this area could disrupt the fragile ecological balance.

Therefore, I advocate for comprehensive planning and careful consideration to ensure that both current and future generations’ interests are addressed. This method transformed Sapa, Vietnam, into a resident-friendly city while preserving its stunning natural scenery. This city tackled the housing shortage, which was a major topic in the 1990s, with improvements in public transportation and designated development zones. Nonetheless, because the forests and mountains are protected by the central government, the city continues to live up to its status as one of the most popular tourist attractions in Vietnam.